The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hamstring prehabilitation
| dc.contributor.advisor | Andrews, Barry | |
| dc.contributor.author | Valadao, Jaime Andre | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-07T11:10:25Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-17T12:46:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-30T22:10:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-17T12:46:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description | Masters of Science | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Hamstring injuries remain a growing concern within a large variety of sports from the elite athlete to the weekend warrior. A copious amount of research has been performed in an attempt to reduce these injuries. The aim of this study was to understand the changes in lengthened state eccentric strength of the hamstrings following four separate protocols. METHODS: A quantitative research approach, using a true experimental design, was adopted for this study. A convenience sample of non-sedentary, 35 male participants, between the ages of 18 and 35 within the City of Cape Town was used. Participants were randomly allocated to one of four groups namely; Control group (C), resistance training alone (RT), neuromuscular electrical stimulation alone (NMES), or NMES superimposed with RT (NMES&RT). Participant’s eccentric hamstring strength was tested in a lengthened state, on the Biodex system 4 Pro™ for the pre- and post-test. The intervention spanned over four weeks. SPSS version 25 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: All groups demonstrated a mean increase in relative peak torque. However, a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no interaction effect (p = 0.411) between the four groups. Further analysis using Magnitude-based inferences (MBI), to identify the magnitude of changes, showed a small positive effect for both the NMES and NMES&RT group when compared to the C and RT groups. CONCLUSION: Although there are no statistically significant differences between the four groups employed in this study (C, RT, NMES, NMES&RT), NMES and NMES&RT did show small positive effects compared to C and RT with a very low likelihood of negative effects. Thus, using NMES either alone or superimposed with resistance training will be beneficial for trained athletes but it is not a necessity and the use of specific resistance training may be just as effective. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/11294 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.subject | Hamstring injuries | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sports injuries | en_US |
| dc.subject | Prehabilitation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Neuromuscular electrical stimulation | en_US |
| dc.title | The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hamstring prehabilitation | en_US |