Comparison between immediate and conventional implant loading for fixed and removable prosthesis
dc.contributor.advisor | Khan, Saadika | |
dc.contributor.author | Palanyandi, Celeste | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-31T07:33:08Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-15T13:07:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-15T13:07:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description | Magister Scientiae Dentium - MSc(Dent) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Literature states that different loading systems have been explored; and are used depending on the clinical situation. The success with each of these systems also differs with regards to quality of bone, the length and diameter of an implant, whether the implant is placed anteriorly or posteriorly, as well as number of implants inserted. This thesis will focus on these aspects to better guide clinical decision makers and practitioners on deciding which loading system can be best suited for the patient. Different types of loading systems include immediate, early, and conventional dental loading. Immediate loading refers to a prosthesis being attached to an implant within 24 hours. | en_US |
dc.description.embargo | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/10877 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental implant | en_US |
dc.subject | Restorative Dentistry | en_US |
dc.subject | Periodontal disease | en_US |
dc.subject | Patients | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison between immediate and conventional implant loading for fixed and removable prosthesis | en_US |