Tillage practices affect weeds differently in monoculture vs. crop rotation

dc.contributor.authorLabuschagne, Johan
dc.contributor.authorMacLaren, Chloe
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, Pieter A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-20T10:00:51Z
dc.date.available2021-01-20T10:00:51Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractReduced tillage practices are widely considered to be more sustainable than conventional tillage practices, but many producers remain reluctant to reduce tillage due to difficulties controlling weeds. Crop rotation is often put forward as the best means to manage weeds in reduced tillage systems, but uncertainties remain around how different tillage practices and crop rotations interact. Here, we assess the effects of four different tillage practices on weed seedbank density and composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum) monoculture (WWWW), and two different rotations, wheat-medic-wheat-medic (annual medic, Medicago spp.; WMWM), and wheat-canola-wheat-lupin (Brassica napus, Lupinus spp.; WCWL). We use data across a whole four-year rotation period from a long-term experiment replicated at two sites in South Africa's winter rainfall region. The four tillage practices assessed follow a gradient of soil disturbance: conventional tillage (CT, soil inversion through ploughing), minimum tillage (MT, shallow soil loosening), no tillage (NT, direct drilling with tine openers) and zero tillage (ZT, direct drilling with disc openers).en_US
dc.identifier.citationLabuschagne, J. et al. (2020). Tillage practices affect weeds differently in monoculture vs. crop rotation. Soil and Tillage Research 205,104795.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-1987
dc.identifier.uri10.1016/j.still.2020.104795
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5698
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectConservation agricultureen_US
dc.subjectCrop rotationen_US
dc.subjectTillageen_US
dc.subjectWeed managementen_US
dc.subjectMonocultureen_US
dc.titleTillage practices affect weeds differently in monoculture vs. crop rotationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167198720305778-main.pdf
Size:
1.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: