Developing context-responsive guidelines to manage recidivism in South Africa’s Department of Correctional Services

dc.contributor.authorSamuels, Jerome
dc.contributor.authorRoman, Nicolette Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorMutiso, Moses Mutua
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-13T07:36:32Z
dc.date.available2026-08-13T07:36:32Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractSouth Africa’s correctional system has long struggled with high rates of repeat offending. Yet the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) has operated without coherent, evidence-informed guidelines for defining or managing recidivism. This matter, without agreed definitions and measurement, is inconsistent; without clear policy guidance, program delivery is uneven; without shared data systems, the justice cluster cannot track what works. The present study addresses this gap through a two-phase qualitative design. Phase 1 drew on a scoping review of international recidivism management literature alongside semi-structured interviews with 29 purposively selected DCS personnel and external justice-sector stakeholders. Thematic analysis identified five critical areas of weakness: definitions, policy mandates, sentence planning processes, rehabilitation programming, and intergovernmental data-sharing. Building on these findings, Phase 2 used two consensus workshops: one with academic experts and a second with 30 multi-sector stakeholders at Goodwood Correctional Centre to refine and validate a set of draft guidelines. The process produced ten interlocking recommendations spanning definitional standards, a dedicated policy task team, RNR-based sentence management, mixed-modality rehabilitation, reformed visitation arrangements, employability pathways, wraparound community support, family mediation protocols, integrated information systems, and biometric identification. Across both workshop phases, one tension surfaced repeatedly: the pull between procedural precision and relational, human-centered support, and the need to assign ownership clearly enough that neither gets sacrificed for the other. The ten guidelines are structured into three implementation tiers: Tier 1 addressing definitions, policy, and training; Tier 2 covers programs, visitation, employment, and support networks; Tier 3 of the DCS implementation framework emphasises technology and digital systems to enhance recidivism management and to incorporate electronic tools for offender risk assessment, monitoring, and data administration, thereby enhancing the precision and efficacy of recidivism tracking. The objective is to establish a framework that DCS can effectively implement.
dc.identifier.citationSamuels, Jerome & Roman, Nicolette & Mutiso, Moses. (2026). Developing context-responsive guidelines to manage recidivism in South Africa’s Department of Correctional Services. Crime, Law and Social Change. 84. 10.1007/s10611-026-10302-4.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-026-10302-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/25146
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
dc.subjectRecidivism management
dc.subjectRisk–Need–Responsivity
dc.subjectConsensus workshop
dc.subjectGuidelines
dc.subjectSocial reintegration
dc.titleDeveloping context-responsive guidelines to manage recidivism in South Africa’s Department of Correctional Services
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
samuels_developing_context_responsive_guidelines_2026.pdf
Size:
961.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: