COVID-19 vaccine uptake, barriers and facilitators among key populations living with HIV/AIDS in Rivers State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional quantitative study

Abstract

The study evaluated COVID-19 vaccine uptake and the barriers and facilitators influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among key populations living with HIV/AIDS in Rivers State, Nigeria. A key population-based cross-sectional study employed purposive sampling to recruit 458 participants from one-stop shops between April–June 2024. Data collection tools were integrated into a Kobo database. SPSS version 27 (IBM, Armonk, USA) for descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square and bivariate logistic regression) analysed vaccine uptake and associated factors, with significance determined at p<0.05. The COVID-19 vaccine uptake was 54.1%, with 22.3% partially vaccinated and 31.8% fully vaccinated. Pfizer-BioNTech (43.5%) and Moderna (22.2%) were the most administered vaccines. Key barriers included lack of information (91.7%), vaccine side effects concerns (88.0%), and distrust in vaccine safety (95.2%). Younger participants, those with shorter antiretroviral therapy (ART) durations, single individuals, and unemployed participants showed significantly lower vaccine uptake (χ²=48.266, 37.689, 29.131, and 62.136; p<0.001). Moderate vaccine uptake highlights gaps in COVID-19 vaccination among key populations. To improve vaccine uptake, tailored interventions addressing stigma, misinformation, and access barriers are recommended. Leveraging community leaders and integrating vaccines into HIV/AIDS care programs can enhance acceptance and delivery.

Description

Citation

Korfii, U., Owhonda, G., Kanee, R.B., Wali, I.A., Showers, V.A., Aigbogun, E. Jr., Neenwi, M.E., Akpona, D., Ajaero, N., Ade-Dosumu, A., Sanusi, F., Bashorun, D. and Uchechukwu, E.I., 2026. COVID-19 vaccine uptake, barriers and facilitators among key populations living with HIV/AIDS in Rivers State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional quantitative study. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 120(5), pp.522–532. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trag005