Basic rights claims How responsive is ‘reasonableness review’?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSandra, Liebenberg
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T11:07:19Z
dc.date.available2019-10-07T11:07:19Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstractSouth Africa’s 1996 Constitution (the Constitution) is widely renowned for its holistic, inclusive Bill of Rights. A particular innovation is its inclusion of a wide range of fully justiciable socio-economic rights. There is now a burgeoning body of jurisprudence from the Constitutional Court interpreting these rights. There can be little doubt that South African jurisprudence has given a significant boost to international endeavors to protect socio-economic rights. Through its jurisprudence, the Court has to achieve a critical balance between effectively protecting the socio-economic rights of the poor, while also respecting the roles of the legislature and executive as the primary branches of government responsible for realising socio-economic rights.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLiebenberg, S. 2004. Basic rights claims How responsive is ‘reasonableness review’? ESR Review. 5/5, 7-11en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5000
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherESR Reviewen_US
dc.subjectReasonableness reviewen_US
dc.subjectMinimum core obligationen_US
dc.subjectSocio-economic rightsen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectConstitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996en_US
dc.titleBasic rights claims How responsive is ‘reasonableness review’?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Liebenberg_basic rights claims_2004.pdf
Size:
56.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Liebenberg_basic rights claims_2004
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Socio-Economic Rights Project (SERP)