Comparison of an essential oil mouth rinse and chlorhexidine on 4-day interproximal plaque regrowth

dc.contributor.advisorStephen, L.X.G.
dc.contributor.authorJarrar, Ahmed Ali.
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-27T09:11:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-15T11:03:03Z
dc.date.available2008/05/14 08:18
dc.date.available2008/05/14
dc.date.available2013-09-27T09:11:00Z
dc.date.available2024-04-15T11:03:03Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.descriptionMagister Scientiae Dentium - MSc(Dent)en_US
dc.description.abstractDental plaque is the most important etiological factor of periodontal diseases. Mechanical plaque control is the most effective way in preventing periodontal diseases. Chemical plaque control methods (such as mouthrinses) have been recommended to be used because of some drawbacks in the mechanical methods in some areas of the dentition (such as interproximal areas). But are these mouthrinses really effective in those areas? The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Essential Oils mouthrinse (Listerine) on plaque formation in interproximal areas with Chlorhexidine and Sterile water.en_US
dc.description.countrySouth Africa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/10814
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectDental plaqueen_US
dc.subjectOral hygieneen_US
dc.subjectDental depositsen_US
dc.subjectPrevention and controlen_US
dc.titleComparison of an essential oil mouth rinse and chlorhexidine on 4-day interproximal plaque regrowthen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jarrar_MSC_2006.pdf
Size:
782.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format