The antimicrobial efficacy of three chlorhexidine mouth rinses: an in-vitro analysis
dc.contributor.advisor | Holmes, Haly | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Peck, M. Thabit | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Basson, Nicholas | |
dc.contributor.author | Abdalrahman, Basheer Mohamed | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-11-14T05:50:05Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-04T08:26:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-11-14T05:50:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-04T08:26:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.description | >Magister Scientiae - MSc | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Different chlorhexidine (CHX) preparations and formulations are available in local markets. Some preparations contain anti-discoloration systems (ADS), additional antimicrobials like cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), or alcohol. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial efficacies of 3 different CHX preparations (Corsodyl®, Curasept® and GUM® Paroex®) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/15842 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
dc.subject | Chlorhexidine | en_US |
dc.subject | Antimicrobial | en_US |
dc.subject | Efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental plaque | en_US |
dc.subject | Oral rinse | en_US |
dc.subject | Facultative anaerobes | en_US |
dc.subject | Strict anaerobes | en_US |
dc.subject | Streptococcus mutans | en_US |
dc.subject | Candida albicans | en_US |
dc.subject | Disk diffusion test | en_US |
dc.title | The antimicrobial efficacy of three chlorhexidine mouth rinses: an in-vitro analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |