A social ontology of �maximal� persons

dc.contributor.authorOyowe, Oritsegbubemi Anthony
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-07T11:40:17Z
dc.date.available2021-10-07T11:40:17Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I address a range of arguments put forward by Kwame Gyekye (1992) and Bernard Matolino (2014) denying Menkiti�s twin propositions that persons differ ontologically from human beings and that human attitudes, behaviours and practices constitute persons in social reality. They argue that his account of �maximal� persons, rooted in African traditional thought?worlds, conflatesissues and ultimately involve him in a category mistake. I argue that their arguments do not succeed, and that Menkiti�s view is not in any predicament because of them. Then, I draw on John Searle�s account of social ontology to clarify the sense in which attitudes, behaviours and practices are constituents of persons. Thus, I characterise persons as social entities belonging in a social ontology.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOyowe, O. A. (2021). A social ontology of �maximal� persons. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1�17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12312en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-5914
dc.identifier.uri10.1111/jtsb.12312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/6869
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectAfricanen_US
dc.subjectConventionsen_US
dc.subjectRealismen_US
dc.subjectSocial ontologyen_US
dc.subjectHuman attitudesen_US
dc.titleA social ontology of �maximal� personsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jtsb.12312.pdf
Size:
324.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: