Local languages: good for the informal marketplace but not for the formal classroom?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Zubeida
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-25T10:19:01Z
dc.date.available2014-07-25T10:19:01Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThe maxim that ‘Languages develop through use, particularly in high domains such as education and the courts’ was propagated by Neville Alexander. He was committed to ‘intellectualising African languages’. In the spirit of his legacy, this article makes a case for using local languages, also referred to as mother tongues, as mediums of instruction. In making this case, two interrelated perspectives on the role of African languages in the broader society, are critiqued. The first perspective argues that languages evolve on their own, and calls for a multilingualism from below. The second perspective is critical of the term ‘mother tongue’, and by implication mother-tongue education. The article also critically examines language in education developments in South Africa, in particular the 1997 Language in Education Policy. It argues that one of the reasons for poor learner performance is current language practices, where the language of instruction shifts abruptly to English at the beginning of Grade 4. Examples of learner performance are given from a study the author conducted in Khayelitsha in the Western Cape. The term ‘mother tongue’ is defined in relation to these critiques. The article concludes by stating that current practices in South Africa continue to privilege English- and Afrikaans-speaking pupils. Drawing on the work of Alexander and others, it argues that linguistic practices from below, regardless of how innovative they are, cannot change power dynamics in unequal societies such as South Africa. It is only when languages are used in high domains such as education that they develop fully.en_US
dc.description.accreditationWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citationDesai, Z. (2013). Local languages: good for the informal marketplace but not for the formal classroom?, Education as Change, 17 (2): 193-207en_US
dc.identifier.issn1682-3206
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/1134
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmitterfalse
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsThis is the authors' final draft following peer review. It may be displayed and circulated, subject to full acknowledgement of author and source. The published item is copyright Taylor & Francis.
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.803659
dc.status.ispeerreviewedtrue
dc.subjectAlexanderen_US
dc.subjectEconomic diglossiaen_US
dc.subjectEnglishen_US
dc.subjectHegemonyen_US
dc.subjectMother tongueen_US
dc.subjectMultilingualismen_US
dc.titleLocal languages: good for the informal marketplace but not for the formal classroom?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DesaiLocalLanguages2013.pdf
Size:
372.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author final version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.55 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Research Articles
Prof. Zubeida Desai