Return to the organic: Onions, artichokes and 'the debate' on the nation and modernity
| dc.contributor.author | Piper, Laurence | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-01T09:04:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-02-01T09:04:32Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.description.abstract | There exist in intellectual history periods where, following intense deliberation on a question, something like a consensus emerges. Typically the consensus amounts to a refinement of the competing views on the question rather than some final resolution. These refined views are then presented as the official ‘debate’ on the question, and faithfully reproduced in university courses world-wide. Something of this sort has happened with theories of nationalism, or to be more accurate, with theories of the modernity of the nation. Indeed, the issue of the modernity of the nation looms large in the Smith, Özkrimili and Guibernau & Hutchinson texts. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Piper, L. (2004). Return to the organic: Onions, artichokes and 'the debate' on the nation and modernity. A Journal of Social and Political Theory ,103, 122-140 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41802815 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/5800 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Berghahn Books | en_US |
| dc.subject | The nation as organic | en_US |
| dc.subject | The nation as onion | en_US |
| dc.subject | The nation as artichoke | en_US |
| dc.subject | Nation and modernity | en_US |
| dc.title | Return to the organic: Onions, artichokes and 'the debate' on the nation and modernity | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |