Magister Chirurgiae Dentium - MChD (Orthodontics)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing by Author "Bellardie, Haydn"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in a sample of patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate in the Western Cape, South Africa(University of the Western Cape, 2024) Galane, Mpatikana Leslie; Bellardie, HaydnUnilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) is a specific form of orofacial cleft (OFC) that accounts for 23% of those born with clefts. In the Eastern Cape, Free State and Northern Cape provinces of South Africa (SA), the prevalence of OFCs is 0.1, 0.1, and 1.2 per 1000, respectively. UCLP is more common in males compared to females, with 2:1 gender distribution. In addition, UCLP has a strong predilection for the left side of the maxilla as compared to the right side. Individuals born with UCLP typically require several surgeries and/or other intricate procedures to rectify this anomaly. Individuals diagnosed with UCLP frequently exhibit a range of functional and aesthetic defects, in addition to the particular deformities associated with the condition. Complications related to UCLP include hypoplastic maxilla and a high incidence of Class III malocclusion. Children who are born with UCLP requires a complex management that starts with specialist nursing care, surgical repair on both the lip (which is generally done at three months of age) and the palate (at any time between six to 14 months of age). Several studies have verified that if the initial surgery is performed unskillfully, it can have a detrimental impact on the growth of the face, development of the dentition, and speech. Establishing a dependable approach for evaluating dental arch relationships is crucial in order to evaluate and contrast the outcomes of early management of UCLP in children.Item A cephalometric and dental analysis of treatment outcomes of unilateral cleft lip and palate children treated at the Red Cross children's hospital(University of the Western Cape, 2000) Kaskar, Salim; Bellardie, HaydnThis study was a cephalometric and dental investigation of the treatment outcomes of UCLP children treated at the Red Cross Children's Hospital (RCCH) with respect to craniofacial morphology and dental arch relationship. The quality of the outcome for the RCCH group was compared with the outcomes reported for the Six-Centre International Study (Melsted et al., 1992; Mars et al., 1992). The sample consisted of 20 (11 females, 9 males) consecutively treated UCLP children who had cephalometric and dental records taken between the ages of8 to 11years (mean 10.13 ± 1.2 years). The cephalometric analysis described by Melsted et al. (1992) was used to evaluate the skeletal and soft tissue morphology. The quality of the dental arch relationship was measured according to the Gosion Yardstick (Mars et al., 1987). The treatment outcome of children treated at the RCCH was evaluated with respect to craniofacial form and dental arch relationship. When comparing the mean cephalometric skeletal parameters of the RCCH to the six centres in the Eurocleft study, a significant difference was found between the RCCH group and centre D for most of the variables. A significant increase in the upper incisor inclination and maxillary inclination was found in the RCCH patients compared to the European centres. The difference in the soft tissue parameters was limited to the relative protrusion of the nose and the sagittal soft tissue variable sss-ns-pgs. The analysis of the Goslon scores showed a significant difference between the RCCH group and centres C, D, and F. According to the Goslon score, 85% of the RCCH patients had good to satisfactory dental arch relationship, which was comparable to that recorded for centres A(92%), B(89%) and C(94). In conclusion, the results of the cephalometric analysis and the Goslon Yardstick showed a significant difference between the RCCH group and centre D. The GosIon score indicated good quality of the dental arch relationship, which faired favourably with the better centres in the Six Centre Study.