South Africa's competing obligations in relation to international crimes - the Zimbabwe Torture Docket case

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorChenwi, Lilian
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T05:46:43Z
dc.date.available2019-10-07T05:46:43Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe need to end impunity for international crimes is largely recognised by the international community. Accordingly, significant obligations have been imposed, by both conventional (treaty) and customary international law, on states to prosecute certain international crimes. In addition to the duty to prosecute, conventional international law also imposes the duty to investigate allegations of international crimes as well as the duty to cooperate in the investigation and prosecution of international crimes.Conventional law has in fact accentuated a duty upon states to exercise jurisdiction over international crimes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationChenwi, L. (2015). 'South Africa's competing obligations in relation to international crimes - the Zimbabwe Torture Docket case'. Constitutional Court Review, 7(1): 199 - 245en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/4939
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherConstitutional Court Reviewen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectCompeting obligationsen_US
dc.subjectInternational crimesen_US
dc.subjectInternational criminal lawen_US
dc.titleSouth Africa's competing obligations in relation to international crimes - the Zimbabwe Torture Docket caseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
South Africa's competing obligations in relation to international crimes - the Zimbabwe Torture Docket case.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Chenwi_Competing obligations_2015
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Socio-Economic Rights Project (SERP)