Entrenching the right to regulate in the international investment legal framework: The African experience

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorWandrag, Riekie
dc.contributor.authorChidede, Talkmore
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T11:24:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T08:16:59Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T11:24:59Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T08:16:59Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionDoctor Legum - LLDen_US
dc.description.abstractThe existing traditional international investment law regime which is largely based on the conventional European and North American Model Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) has come under intense criticism. The argument is that this regime, among other things, prioritises the protection of foreign investors and investments while sidelining significant public interest issues of the host countries. The inability to adequately accommodate public interest issues in the international investment law has unduly constrained the host countries’ sovereign right to regulate investments in public interests and pursue their public policy objectives.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/20215
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectBilateral investment treatyen_US
dc.subjectEconomic developmenten_US
dc.subjectForeign direct investmenten_US
dc.subjectInternational investment agreementsen_US
dc.subjectInternational investment lawen_US
dc.titleEntrenching the right to regulate in the international investment legal framework: The African experienceen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
chidede_phd_law_2019.pdf
Size:
24.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Doctor Legum - LLD