A global systematic review of resource nexus and nature-positive sustainable development: an invitation to a new research agenda

dc.contributor.authorO’Farrell, Patrick John
dc.contributor.authorMakwinja, Yamikani Harry
dc.contributor.authorKimengsi, Jude Ndzifon
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-21T08:31:02Z
dc.date.available2025-11-21T08:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThe Resource Nexus concept is acknowledged as a transformative approach to managing resource challenges. Yet, its contribution to nature-positive sustainable development (NPSD) practices remains less understood. This study (i) analyses how resource nexus and NPSD practices have been conceptualised in the literature, (ii) determines the state-of-the-art on the NPSD outcomes that are driven by the Resource Nexus approach, and (iii) identifies methodological development in Resource Nexus and NPSD studies. Search queries were conducted in the Scopus core collection, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Science Direct, resulting in the inclusion of 117 empirical studies. The study reveals that while Resource Nexus offers a broad lens for engaging with these different environmental resources, its integration with NPSD practices remains underexplored. Firstly, the overall dominance of the water-energy-food (WEF) Nexus (28.2%) was reported, followed by the water-energy-food-climate (WEFC) Nexus (24.8%), and the biota-energy-food-climate (BEFC) Nexus (15.4%). Secondly, most papers reported ecological parameters (61.3%) as the significant NPSD outcomes driven by the Resource Nexus, followed by political (48.7%), and economic (44.4%) outcomes. Only 17% of papers reported socio-cultural outcomes. Finally, quantitative approaches were most commonly used in the literature (56.4%), followed by qualitative approaches (33.3%), while the mixed methods approach (10.3%) remained the least frequently used. Our review highlights the urgent need for a new research agenda focused on (i) a diverse Resource Nexus constellation, (ii) transformative coupled citizen science research that develops actionable strategies to complete the Science-policy-practice cycle, and (iii)innovative research methodologies focusing on multi-level and mixed-method approaches while preserving the diverse values of qualitative and quantitative approaches.
dc.identifier.citationMakwinja, Y.H., Kimengsi, J.N., O’Farrell, P.J. and Guenther, E., 2025. A global systematic review of resource nexus and nature-positive sustainable development: An invitation to a new research agenda. Sustainable Environment, 11(1), p.2554480.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2554480
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/21449
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.subjectNature-positive economy
dc.subjectResource efficiency
dc.subjectResource nexus
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectTransformation
dc.titleA global systematic review of resource nexus and nature-positive sustainable development: an invitation to a new research agenda
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
o’farrell_a_global_systematic_review_2025.pdf
Size:
5.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: