Comparing patient-based outcomes related to neutral zone and conventional mandibular dentures: A systematic review
| dc.contributor.author | Geerts, Greta | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khan, Saadika Begum | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-23T10:56:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-10-23T10:56:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Neutral zone mandibular dentures are considered tobe superior to conventional complete dentures.Conventional complete dentures (CD) have been the most common and only treatment modality for rehabilitation of edentulousness until the introduction of dental implants. Implant-retained or implant-supported prostheses have been proven to be superior to conventional CDs in terms of patient-based outcomes (PBOs).' However, implant therapy may be out of reach of patients due to a variety of reasons. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Geerts, G., & Khan, S. B. (2017). Comparing patient-based outcomes related to neutral zone and conventional mandibular dentures: A systematic review. South African Dental Journal.72 (4),284 - 289. Doi: | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0375-1562 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/5300 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | South African Dental Association | en_US |
| dc.subject | Neutral zone mandibular dentures | en_US |
| dc.subject | Patient-based outcomes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Dental implants | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparing patient-based outcomes related to neutral zone and conventional mandibular dentures: A systematic review | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |