The relative impact of an argumentation-based instructional intervention programme on Grade 10 learners' conceptions of lightning and thunder
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ogunniyi, Meshach B | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moyo, Partson Virira | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-11T13:21:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-08-11T13:21:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The basic premise of this study was that when a learner is confronted with two contradictory explanations of the same phenomenon, there is cognitive dissonance in the learner as the learner tries to determine which of the two explanations is correct. An argumentation-based instructional intervention programme (ABIIP) was created for and used on and by the Grade 10 learners in order to attempt to ameliorate this cognitive conflict. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of that intervention programme on Grade 10 learners' conceptions of lightning and thunder. The programme was designed to help learners to develop argumentative skills and use the acquired skills to negotiate and harmonise divergent and conflicting explanations of the nature of lightning and thunder that are propounded by different worldviews (Science and indigenous knowledge). | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/25113 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | |
| dc.subject | Argumentation | |
| dc.subject | argumentation instructional programme | |
| dc.subject | grade 10 learners | |
| dc.subject | school science | |
| dc.subject | western modern science | |
| dc.title | The relative impact of an argumentation-based instructional intervention programme on Grade 10 learners' conceptions of lightning and thunder | |
| dc.type | Thesis |