Optimising benefits for rural communities in and around Protected Areas through ecotourism Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): the case of De Hoop Nature Reserve
| dc.contributor.advisor | Boekstein, Mark | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mnyani, Siphokazi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-03T08:38:38Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-20T11:40:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-11-03T08:38:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-20T11:40:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description | Magister Artium - MA | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Recent years have seen an upsurge of interest from governments and development organisations in adopting the Public Private Partnership (PPP) approach when developing and operating ecotourism projects. A PPP is a contract between a public sector institution and a private party, in which the private party assumes substantial financial, technical and operational risk in the design, financing, building and operation of a project (South African National Treasury 2004). Countries such as India, China and Kenya have developed numerous projects through PPPs. Protected Areas have followed suit in adopting the PPP approach, to be able to focus on their core business, namely conservation. To date, relevant research on PPP ecotourism projects, specifically pro-poor tourism approach is fragmented, limited in scope, and lacks examples that can assist practitioners in embedding pro-poor tourism principles in the PPP methodology. Academically, studies are largely evaluations that compare progress against projects� defined objectives or broad based sustainable tourism goals. However, this study is an assessment of a tourism development from a pro-poor tourism perspective. Thus, this study interrogated the extent to which ecotourism PPP at De Hoop is pro-poor. Furthermore, the study sought to establish if rural local communities living in and near De Hoop PPP benefit and how their benefits can be enhanced. Pro-poor tourism indicators are used in this study as a theoretical base to evaluate De Hoop PPP. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/9388 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.subject | Public private partnerships (PPPs) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Ecotourism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Poverty alleviation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Local economic development | en_US |
| dc.subject | Protected areas | en_US |
| dc.subject | Sustainable development | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rural development | en_US |
| dc.subject | Pro-poor tourism (PPT) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Protected areas (PAs) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Community benefits | en_US |
| dc.subject | Community attitudes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Participation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Nature reserves | en_US |
| dc.title | Optimising benefits for rural communities in and around Protected Areas through ecotourism Public Private Partnerships (PPPs): the case of De Hoop Nature Reserve | en_US |