The effects of diferent reinforcements on the fracture toughness of provisional restorative materials

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGeerts, Greta
dc.contributor.authorOverturf, Jan Hendrik
dc.contributor.otherDept. of Prosthodontics
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-11T09:29:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-17T06:59:52Z
dc.date.available2009/10/08 12:45
dc.date.available2009/10/08
dc.date.available2013-10-11T09:29:00Z
dc.date.available2024-04-17T06:59:52Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.descriptionMagister Chirurgiae Dentium - MChDen_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the most critical aspects of successful crown and bridgework is temporary restorations. Failure of temporary restoratins often affects the patient's confidence and mau result in unscheduled appointments for repair. This study compared the the fracture toughness of two materials commonly used to fabricate provisional restorations, namely Coldpac, a polymethyl methacrylate and Protemp 3 Garant, a bis-acryl composite. It also compard the fracture toughness of the two materials when reinforced with stainless steel wire, glass fibers and polythylene fibers.en_US
dc.description.countrySouth Africa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/11081
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectDental restorationen_US
dc.subjectCrowns [Dentistry]en_US
dc.subjectProsthodonticsen_US
dc.titleThe effects of diferent reinforcements on the fracture toughness of provisional restorative materialsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Overturf_MCHD_2006.pdf
Size:
810.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Magister Scientiae Dentium - MSc(Dent) (Prosthodontics)