Comparison between chemical and tissue culture methods to monitor environmental Estrogens
| dc.contributor.advisor | Pool, E.J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baguma, Richard | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-14T09:24:45Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-04T13:15:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-14T09:24:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-04T13:15:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.description | Magister Scientiae (Medical Bioscience) - MSc(MBS) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) are exogenous compounds/chemicals in the environment that interfere with the synthesis, secretion, distribution and function or elimination of natural hormones in the body. Environmental estrogens are a subclass of EDCs that may mimic or inhibit the effect of endogenous estrogen and can therefore influence developmental and reproductive health in humans and animals. EDCs have been reported to adversely affect the reproductive, immune, endocrine and nervous systems of wildlife and humans. The effects of EDCs include gonadal abnormalities, altered male/female sex ratios, reduced fertility and cancers of the male and female reproductive tract to mention a few. These effects are difficult to detect. Although it is essential to screen for EDCs in aqueous environmental samples, most countries have failed to implement this as part of their routine water quality monitoring programs due to various constraints such as the high cost of assays and the lack of infrastructure and skills required to do the assays. Therefore, there is a clear need for more user-friendly, more economically viable and time saving assays that can be used for routine monitoring of environmental EDCs. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparison between chemical and tissue culture methods to monitor environmental estrogens. 28 environmental water samples were collected from various sites around South Africa and analyzed for EDCs using a battery of rapid in vitro tests. Samples collected for the current study were selected based on various human impacts and also to give approximately 50% high and 50% low estrogen values. The 28 environmental water samples were separated into two groups based on the estradiol ELISA. The estradiol ELISA was chosen because estradiol is the principal estrogen found in all mammalian species during their reproductive years. For this separation, an estradiol level of 5 pg/ml was used as cut-off. Of the 28 samples investigated, 15 had estradiol levels higher than 5 pg/ml and were designated as high estradiol. The remaining 13 samples contained estradiol at 5 pg/ml or less and they were designated as low estradiol The first objective of this study was to compare different rapid ELISAs for EDC monitoring to determine if the data obtained with these assays are similar/identical. The data obtained from the estrogenic ELISAs was related/similar and showed good correlation with each other. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/17231 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.subject | Endocrine disrupting compounds | en_US |
| dc.subject | Bioassay | en_US |
| dc.subject | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay | en_US |
| dc.subject | Steroidogenesis | en_US |
| dc.subject | Androgens | en_US |
| dc.subject | Anti-androgens | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparison between chemical and tissue culture methods to monitor environmental Estrogens | en_US |