Administration of the adjusted Rorschach comrehensive system to learners in a previously disadvantaged school in the western Cape
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kekae, Moletsane M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Robert, Makuna Kananga M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-04T07:57:40Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-15T08:01:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-04T07:57:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-15T08:01:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.description | Magister Educationis - MEd | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The study focuses on the administration procedure of Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System (ARCS) to learners from a previously disadvantaged school in the Western Cape. ARCS is the Rorschach administration procedure developed by Moletsane-Kekae (2004) in her research study. The aim of the study was to determine the response rate of learners from a previously disadvantaged school when they were exposed to the Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System (ARCS). The objectives are to determine the possible factors that can lead to high and low response rate when administering Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System (ARCS). The main assumption that guides the study was that the responses of the administration of Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System (ARCS) to the learners from a previously disadvantaged school in the Western Cape would yield more than 14 responses (R>14). The study adopted a qualitative approach, case study design, interpretivist paradigm. The Rorschach test, ARCS procedure, observation, interview, and Field notes were used as data collection techniques. The sample was made of six learners (3 girls and 3 boys) in Year 1 selected from a previously disadvantaged school in Cape Town. In order to analyze the data, the thematic analysis and interpretation procedures were used. The results revealed that the majority of the learners gave high responses, because the ARCS accommodated their cultures, believe and backgrounds. This study found out that language, seating arrangement, strategies using during the ARCS procedure were the factors that influenced the higher response rate. Furthermore, the study also found that the lack of previous exposure and experience of the psychological test was a factor that can lead to low response. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/10607 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.subject | Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System (ARCS) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rorschach test | en_US |
| dc.subject | Previously disadvantaged school | en_US |
| dc.subject | Cape Town | en_US |
| dc.subject | Education | en_US |
| dc.subject | Psychology - tests | en_US |
| dc.subject | School learners | en_US |
| dc.subject | Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.title | Administration of the adjusted Rorschach comrehensive system to learners in a previously disadvantaged school in the western Cape | en_US |