In vitro antimicrobial comparison of three commercially available chlorhexidine-based oral rinses
| dc.contributor.author | Abdalrahman, Basheer Mohamed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Holmes, Haly | |
| dc.contributor.author | Peck, Mogammad T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Basson, Nicolaas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-23T09:30:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-05-23T09:30:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: Commercially available chlorhexidine (CHX) formulations differ in their CHX concentrations (0.2% and 0.12%) as well as in various additives including alcohol, antimicrobials such as cetylpyridinium chloride and antidiscolouration chemicals such as ascorbic acid and sodium metabisulphite. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To compare in vitro the antimicrobial efficacies of three different CHX preparations (Corsodyl ®, Curasept® and GUM® Paroex®) using 0.2% and 0.12% CHX concentrations as controls METHODS: A disk diffusion test was performed using pure cultures of the organisms Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans, and mixed cultures (facultative and strict anaerobes) prepared from oral rinse samples of 14 study participants. The means and standard deviations of the diameters of inhibition zones were calculated. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (p value = 0.0001) was found only in Candida albicans cultures between the mean inhibition zones of the CHX preparation disks. Pure CHX preparations and Corsodyl® showed higher antifungal efficacy than Curasept® and GUM® Paroex Conclusion: Both CHX preparations (0.12% and 0.2%) and the 0.2% CHX preparation containing alcohol (Corsodyl®) have more potent antifungal properties against C. albicans than alcohol-free 0.12% CHX preparations such as Curasept® and GUM® Paroex®. | en_US |
| dc.description.accreditation | DHET | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abdalrahman, B.M. et al. (2016). In vitro antimicrobial comparison of three commercially available chlorhexidine-based oral rinses. South African Dentristry Journal, 71(7): 304 - 307 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0375-1562 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/3725 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.privacy.showsubmitter | FALSE | |
| dc.publisher | South African Dental Association | en_US |
| dc.rights | This file may be freely used for educational uses. No commercial reproduction or distribution of this file is permitted without written permission of the South African Dental Association (SADA). Note that the SADA retains all intellectual property rights in the article. | |
| dc.status.ispeerreviewed | TRUE | |
| dc.subject | Chlorhexidine (CHX) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Antimicrobial efficacies | en_US |
| dc.subject | Oral rinses | en_US |
| dc.title | In vitro antimicrobial comparison of three commercially available chlorhexidine-based oral rinses | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |