The constitutionally bound dead hand? The impact of constitutional rights and principles on freedom of testation in South African law

dc.contributor.authordu Toit, Francois
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-01T08:21:06Z
dc.date.available2011-08-01T08:21:06Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses critically the impact of constitutionalism on freedom of testation and its limitation in South African law. It proposes the judicial utilisation of a 'constitutionally-founded boni mores criterion' in addressing particularly testamentary forfeiture clauses and charitable testamentary bequests.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDu Toit, F. (2001). The constitutionally bound dead hand? The impact of constitutional rights and principles on freedom of testation in South African law. Stellenbosch Law Review, 2001 (2): 222-257en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-4359
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/230
dc.inquiriesfdutoit@uwc.ac.za
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.privacy.showsubmittertrue
dc.publisherJutaen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Juta Law. Permission granted to reproduce the article in the Repository. Please cite original source and link to this site.
dc.status.ispeerreviewedtrue
dc.subjectFreedom of testationen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionalismen_US
dc.subjectPublic policyen_US
dc.subjectBill of Rightsen_US
dc.subjectEqualityen_US
dc.subjectNon-discriminationen_US
dc.titleThe constitutionally bound dead hand? The impact of constitutional rights and principles on freedom of testation in South African lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Stell LR 2001.pdf
Size:
17.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.55 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: