Subgroup differences in situational judgment test scores: Evidence from large applicant samples

dc.contributor.authorHerde, Christoph Nils
dc.contributor.authorLievens, Filip
dc.contributor.authorShalfrooshan, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T13:21:46Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T13:21:46Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTo promote diversity in organizations it is important to have accurate knowledge about subgroup differences associated with selection procedures. However, current estimates of subgroup differences in situational judgment tests (SJTs) are overwhelmingly based on range‐restricted incumbent samples that are downwardly biased. This study provides much‐needed applicant level estimates of SJT subgroup differences (N = 37,530). As a key finding, Black‐White differences (d = 0.66) were higher than in incumbent samples (d = 0.38).en_US
dc.identifier.citationHerde, C. N. (2020). Subgroup differences in situational judgment test scores: Evidence from large applicant samples. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(1), 45-54. Doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12269en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-2389
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5413
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.subjectTest scoresen_US
dc.subjectSubgroup differencesen_US
dc.subjectIQ knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectDiversityen_US
dc.titleSubgroup differences in situational judgment test scores: Evidence from large applicant samplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijsa.12269.pdf
Size:
487.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: