Subgroup differences in situational judgment test scores: Evidence from large applicant samples
dc.contributor.author | Herde, Christoph Nils | |
dc.contributor.author | Lievens, Filip | |
dc.contributor.author | Shalfrooshan, Ali | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-10T13:21:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-10T13:21:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description.abstract | To promote diversity in organizations it is important to have accurate knowledge about subgroup differences associated with selection procedures. However, current estimates of subgroup differences in situational judgment tests (SJTs) are overwhelmingly based on range‐restricted incumbent samples that are downwardly biased. This study provides much‐needed applicant level estimates of SJT subgroup differences (N = 37,530). As a key finding, Black‐White differences (d = 0.66) were higher than in incumbent samples (d = 0.38). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Herde, C. N. (2020). Subgroup differences in situational judgment test scores: Evidence from large applicant samples. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28(1), 45-54. Doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12269 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1468-2389 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10566/5413 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
dc.subject | Test scores | en_US |
dc.subject | Subgroup differences | en_US |
dc.subject | IQ knowledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Diversity | en_US |
dc.title | Subgroup differences in situational judgment test scores: Evidence from large applicant samples | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |