Common/wealth: Contested commons and proleptic critique

dc.contributor.authorvan der Vlies, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T10:57:32Z
dc.date.available2025-10-29T10:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIn May 1917, two South African feminist friends and critics of empire then in London sent a telegram to Field Marshal Jan Smuts, the union of South Africa’s defence minister and delegate to the Imperial war cabinet, in response to his early proposal for a commonwealth of nations. It read simply: “Your speech was fine”. Whether intended sincerely (as in “very fine”) or as faint praise (“fine as far as it goes, but”) is not known, but the ambiguity is fitting for an association and description with such contested associations – and one that, by some accounts, originated in the colonies (from an idea proposed by Canadian Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King and South Africa’s then-Prime Minister J. B. M. Hertzog). It is fitting, too, that one of the cable’s authors was Olive Schreiner (1855-1920), leading novelist of the “new woman”, advocate of sex equality, and clear-sighted critic of empire’s presumptions, rapacious designs, and gendered and ethnic biases, as well as of the race politics taking shape in South Africa at the start of the twentieth century. Even as we read Schreiner’s work today with an eye to its own prejudices and contradictions, this essay contends that it is worth considering the value of the proleptic critique it embodies for an understanding of the ongoing limitations — but also use-value — of the term “commonwealth”, as well as of any term that might replace it. The outlines of Schreiner’s critique suggest that the term might yet encode a counter-ideal that points to an ongoing latent potential for the common to be reactivated as promise of a more equal and just division of empire’s spoils.
dc.identifier.citationvan der Vlies, A., 2024. Common/wealth: Contested commons and proleptic critique. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, p.00219894241228715.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00219894241228715
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/21288
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltd
dc.subjectDominion
dc.subjectJan Smuts
dc.subjectOlive Schreiner
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.subjectThe commons
dc.titleCommon/wealth: Contested commons and proleptic critique
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
van der vlies_common_wealth_contested_commons_2024.pdf
Size:
121.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: