(De)legitimizing rape as a weapon of war: patriarchy, narratives and the African Union
| dc.contributor.advisor | Pretorius, Joelien | |
| dc.contributor.author | Langeveldt, Veleska | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-16T09:14:16Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-03T09:36:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-04-16T09:14:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-03T09:36:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.description | Magister Administrationis - MAdmin | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The African continent has over the past 40 years witnessed a continued scourge of violent conflict and human rights abuses. These conflicts have significantly undermined the social, political, and economic prosperity of African citizens. Additionally, women and children are particularly affected by these conflicts. Women and children are regarded as ‘the most vulnerable’ as they often become the targets of sexual abuse by the enemy. The African Union (AU) is primarily responsible for the resolution of conflicts on the continent. It professes to be committed to the prevention of human rights abuses and the protection of African women (and children) during armed conflicts. It has thus developed an array of mechanisms, protocols, and instruments to address the exploitation and sexual abuse of women during conflict periods. These instruments include: The Constitutive Act of the AU (2000); The Solemn Declaration of Gender Equality in Africa (2003); the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa- ACHPRWA (2004); and the Protocol relating to the Peace and Security Council. In this research project, I consider whether the narratives used in these AU documents sufficiently and explicitly address the use of rape as a strategic weapon during armed conflicts; or whether these narratives inadvertently contribute to a culture that perpetuates war-time rape. My analysis shows that these AU documents deal with war-time rape in very vague and euphemistic terms. Although gender discrimination, sexual violence, exploitation, discrimination, and harmful practices against women are condemned, the delegitimization of rape as a weapon of war is not specifically discussed. This allows for varying interpretations of AU protocols, including interpretations which may diminish the severity of strategic rape. This has lead me to propose that the narratives used in these AU protocols and related documents draw on patriarchy, perpetuate patriarchy, and thus inadvertently perpetuates a culture that perpetuates the use of rape as a weapon of war | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10566/12806 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | en_US |
| dc.subject | Africa | en_US |
| dc.subject | women | en_US |
| dc.subject | rape | en_US |
| dc.subject | weapons | en_US |
| dc.subject | delegitimizing | en_US |
| dc.subject | armed conflict | en_US |
| dc.subject | narrative | en_US |
| dc.subject | norms | en_US |
| dc.subject | security studies | en_US |
| dc.subject | social construction | en_US |
| dc.subject | feminism | en_US |
| dc.subject | chemical weapons | en_US |
| dc.subject | anti-personnel landmines | en_US |
| dc.subject | African Union (AU) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Peace and Security Council (PSC) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Regional Economic Communities (RECs) | en_US |
| dc.title | (De)legitimizing rape as a weapon of war: patriarchy, narratives and the African Union | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |