Limitation of socio-economic rights in the 2010 Kenyan Constitution: a proposal for the adoption of a proportionality approach in the judicial adjudication of socio-economic rights disputes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorNicholas, Orago
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-07T12:22:58Z
dc.date.available2019-10-07T12:22:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractOn 27 August 2010 Kenya adopted a transformative Constitution with the objective of fighting poverty and inequality as well as improving the standards of living of all people in Kenya. One of the mechanisms in the 2010 Constitution aimed at achieving this egalitarian transformation is the entrenchment of justiciable socio-economic rights (SERs), an integral part of the Bill of Rights. The entrenched SERs require the State to put in place a legislative, policy and programmatic framework to enhance the realisation of its constitutional obligations to respect, protect and fulfill these rights for all Kenyans. These SER obligations, just like any other fundamental human rights obligations, are, however, not absolute and are subject to legitimate limitation by the State. Two approaches have been used in international and comparative national law jurisprudence to limit SERs: the proportionality approach, using a general limitation clause that has found application in international and regional jurisprudence on the one hand; and the reasonableness approach, using internal limitations contained in the standard of progressive realisation, an approach that has found application in the SER jurisprudence of the South African Courts, on the other hand. This article proposes that if the entrenched SERs are to achieve their transformative objectives, Kenyan courts must adopt a proportionality approach in the judicial adjudication of SER disputes. This proposal is based on the reasoning that for the entrenched SERs to have a substantive positive impact on the lives of the Kenyan people, any measure by the government aimed at their limitation must be subjected to strict scrutiny by the courts, a form of scrutiny that can be achieved only by using the proportionality standard entrenched in the article 24 general limitation clause.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOrago, NW. 2013. Limitation of socio-economic rights in the 2010 Kenyan Constitution: a proposal for the adoption of a proportionality approach in the judicial adjudication of socio-economic rights disputes. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. 16/5, 170-219en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10566/5013
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journalen_US
dc.subjectKenyan constitutionen_US
dc.subjectSocio-economic rightsen_US
dc.subjectJudicial adjudicationen_US
dc.subjectProportionality approachen_US
dc.subjectTransformative constitutionen_US
dc.subjectLimitation of rightsen_US
dc.titleLimitation of socio-economic rights in the 2010 Kenyan Constitution: a proposal for the adoption of a proportionality approach in the judicial adjudication of socio-economic rights disputesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Orago_limitation of SER in the 2010 Kenyan Constitution_2013.pdf
Size:
455.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Orago_limitation of socio-economic rights_2013
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Socio-Economic Rights Project (SERP)