Browsing by Author "Titinchi, F"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Comparison of a piezoelectric and a standard surgical handpiece in third molar surgery(UWC, 2019) Titinchi, F; Gopal, I; Morkel, JAim: The aim was to compare the use of a piezoelectric hand piece versus a standard surgical handpiece in removal of impacted third molars under general anaesthesia. Materials and methods: Thirty patients undergoing routine third molar removal were included in the study. Panoramic radiographs were used to assess the positioning of the impacted third molars. The patients were randomly subdivided and the split mouth technique was used in which each side (left or right) of the mouth was randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Hence each patient served as their own control. In one group, a piezoelectric handpiece was used, while a conventional handpiece was used for the second group. All aspects of preoperative care, general anaesthesia, surgery and post-operative care were standardised for the two groups. The following parameters were recorded; time of surgery, bleeding during surgery, post-operative swelling, post-operative pain, associated complications and post-operative nerve injury. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pain and swelling. There was less bleeding with the use of the piezoelectric device as compared with the standard surgical handpiece; however, the surgical time was longer. There were no reports of trauma to the lips or intra-oral soft tissue. There were two incidences (6.7%) of post-operative paraesthesia in the standard surgical handpiece group. Conclusions: The use of a piezoelectric device is an acceptable alternative to the standard surgical handpiece in third molar surgery. Its use is advocated in difficult cases especially where there is inferior alveolar nerve approximation.Item Dental development in a sample of South African HIV-positive children(UWC, 2018) Titinchi, FAims: While oral soft tissue manifestations associated with HIV-infection in children are well documented, few studies have investigated the dental development of this group. The aim of this study was to assess dental development in a sample of HIVpositive children in comparison with an age-matched HIV-negative control group. Methods and results: The sample comprised 44 HIV-positive children and 44 HIVnegative children matched for age, gender, and ethnicity. An orthopantomograph (OPG) of each patient was assessed in order to calculate the dental age. The mineralization stages of teeth were used to calculate the dental age using tables formulated by Phillips and van Wyk-Kotze for this grouping. Results showed that dental development for both groups were similar to the dental age-related tables. HIV-positive children between 8 and 10 years of age showed significantly advanced dental development (p = 0.04). HIV-positive females showed significant advancement in dental age as compared to their chronological ages. Thirty-six (81.8%) HIV-positive children were on antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. Conclusion: HIV-positive children presented stages of dental development in accordance with their chronological ages and in tandem with that of the HIV-negative controls.