Browsing by Author "Thomas, Haley L"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Longitudinal impact of past-year reproductive coercion on contraceptive use dynamics in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from eight population-based cohorts
    (Elsevier Ltd, 2024) Omoluabi, Elizabeth; Wood, Shannon N; Thomas, Haley L
    Background: Reproductive coercion (RC) is a type of abuse where a partner intentionally attempts to interfere with fertility through deception or violence, often by manipulating one's contraceptive use or reproductive decision-making. Cross-sectional studies on the magnitude of RC across sub-Saharan Africa have noted associations with contraceptive use. No studies have longitudinally examined RC experiences as related to future contraceptive dynamics, including discontinuation or forgoing use altogether. Methods: Two rounds of longitudinal population-based cohorts across eight sites in sub-Saharan Africa, from November 2020 to January 2023, were used to prospectively examine past-year RC's impact on future contraceptive dynamics (discontinuation and switching vs. continuation for contraceptive users at baseline; adoption vs. continued non-use for contraceptive non-users at baseline) using bivariate and multivariable multinomial and logistic regression. Findings: Minimal differences in women's past-year RC experiences were observed over a two-year period. In many settings, RC prevalence decreased. Only in Uganda did past-year RC increase between rounds (15.8% to 17.8%). RC's impact on contraceptive dynamics over one year differed by setting. In Burkina Faso, women with past-year RC had a three-fold increased risk of discontinuing contraception, as compared to continuing (RRR = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.28–5.42; p<0.01). In Uganda, past-year RC was marginally associated with reduced odds of contraceptive adoption, compared to continued non-use (p<0.1). Interpretation: In this first longitudinal study of RC, trajectories varied across settings, as did RC's impact on contraception, affirming the importance of context. Future work should clarify RC trajectories and drivers thereof. Providers must be aware of RC leading to potential discontinuation. Contraceptive provision must be flexible and reflect women's life circumstances, including partner dynamics. Funding: This work was supported, in whole, by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [ INV-046501 and INV-009639]. Under the grant conditions of the Foundation, a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic License has already been assigned to the Author Accepted Manuscript version that might arise from this submission.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prevalence and correlates of reproductive coercion across ten sites: commonalities and divergence
    (BMC, 2023) Wood, Shannon N; Thomas, Haley L; Omoluabi, Elizabeth; Gichangi, Peter
    Background Reproductive coercion (RC) is a type of abuse where a partner asserts control over a woman’s reproductive health trajectories. Recent research emphasizes that RC experiences may differ within and across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), as compared to higher income contexts, given social pressures surrounding childbearing. To date, nationally representative surveys have lacked comprehensive measures for RC, leading to gaps in understanding its prevalence and risk factors. Across eight LMICs (10 sites), we aimed to (1) validate the RC Scale; (2) calculate prevalence of RC and specific behaviors; and (3) assess correlates of RC. Methods This analysis leverages cross-sectional Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) data collected from November 2020 to May 2022. Analyses were limited to women in need of contraception (Burkina Faso n = 2767; Côte d’Ivoire n = 1561; Kongo Central, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) n = 830; Kinshasa, DRC n = 846; Kenya n = 4588; Kano, Nigeria n = 535; Lagos, Nigeria n = 612; Niger n = 1525; Rajasthan, India n = 3017; Uganda n = 2020). Past-year RC was assessed via five items adapted from the original RC Scale and previously tested in LMICs. Confirmatory factor analysis examined fit statistics by site. Per-item and overall prevalence were calculated. Site-specific bivariate and multivariable logistic regression examined RC correlates across the socioecological framework. Results Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit across all sites, with moderate internal consistency (alpha range: 0.66 Cote d’Ivoire–0.89 Kinshasa, DRC/Lagos, Nigeria). Past-year reported prevalence of RC was highest in Kongo Central, DRC (20.3%) and lowest in Niger (3.1%). Prevalence of individual items varied substantially by geography. Polygyny was the most common RC risk factor across six sites (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) range: 1.59–10.76). Increased partner education levels were protective in Kenya and Kano, Nigeria (aOR range: 0.23–0.67). Other assessed correlates differed by site. Conclusions Understanding RC prevalence and behaviors is central to providing woman-centered reproductive care. RC was most strongly correlated with factors at the partner dyad level; future research is needed to unpack the relative contributions of relationship power dynamics versus cultural norms surrounding childbearing. Family planning