Browsing by Author "Tawa, Nassib"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review(BMC, 2017) Tawa, Nassib; Rhoda, Anthea; Diener, InaBACKGROUND: Lumbar radiculopathy remains a clinical challenge among primary care clinicians in both assessment and diagnosis. This often leads to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment of patients resulting in poor health outcomes, exacerbating this already debilitating condition. This review evaluated 12 primary diagnostic accuracy studies that specifically assessed the performance of various individual and grouped clinical neurological tests in detecting nerve root impingement, as established in the current literature. METHODS: Eight electronic data bases were searched for relevant articles from inception until July 2016. All primary diagnostic studies which investigated the accuracy of clinical neurological test (s) in diagnosing lumbar radiculopathy among patients with low back and referred leg symptoms were screened for inclusion. Qualifying studies were retrieved and independently assessed for methodological quality using the ‘Quality Assessment of Diagnostic tests Accuracy Studies’ criteria. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies which investigated standard components of clinical neurological examination of (sensory, motor, tendon reflex and neuro-dynamics) of the lumbo-sacral spine were included. The mean inter-observer agreement on quality assessment by two independent reviewers was fair (k = 0.3 – 0.7). The diagnostic performance of sensory testing using MR imaging as a reference standard demonstrated a sensitivity (confidence interval 95%) 0.61 (0.47-0.73) and a specificity of 0.63 (0.38-0.84). Motor tests sensitivity was poor to moderate, ranging from 0.13 (0.04-0.31) to 0.61 (0.36-0.83). Generally, the diagnostic performance of reflex testing was notably good with specificity ranging from (confidence interval 95%) 0.60 (0.51-0.69) to 0.93 (0.87-0.97) and sensitivity ranging from 0.14 (0.09-0.21) to 0.67 (0.21-0.94). Femoral nerve stretch test had a high sensitivity of (confidence interval 95%) 1.00 (0.40-1.00) and specificity of 0.83 (0.52-0.98) while SLR test recorded a mean sensitivity of 0.84 (0.72-0.92) and specificity of 0.78 (0.67-0.87). CONCLUSION: There is a scarcity of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical neurological examination testing. Furthermore there seem to be a disconnect among researchers regarding the diagnostic utility of lower limb neurodynamic tests which include the Straight Leg Raise and Femoral Nerve tests for sciatic and femoral nerve respectively. Whether these tests are able to detect the presence of disc herniation and subsequent nerve root compression or hyper-sensitivity of the sacral and femoral plexus due to mechanical irritation still remains debatable.Item Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting lumbo-sacral nerve root compromise: A systematic literature review(BioMed Central, 2016) Tawa, Nassib; Rhoda, Anthea; Diener, InaBackground: MRI is considered to be the diagnostic tool of choice in diagnosing nerve root compromise among patients presenting with clinical suspicion of lumbo-sacral radiculopathy. There exists controversy among researchers and clinicians regarding the diagnostic utility and accuracy of MRI in detecting nerve root compromise and radiculopathy. This review evaluated 4 primary diagnostic accuracy studies that specifically assessed the accuracy of MRI in detecting nerve root compromise, as established in the current literature. Methods: Eight electronic data bases were searched for relevant articles from inception until January 2014. All primary diagnostic studies which investigated the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing nerve root compromise among patients with low back and referred leg symptoms were screened for inclusion. Qualifying studies were retrieved and independently assessed for methodological quality using the 'Quality Assessment of Diagnostic tests Accuracy Studies' criteria. Results: Four studies qualified for inclusion in this review. The sensitivity of MRI in detecting lumbar nerve root compromise was very low at 0.25 (95 % CI) while the specificity was relatively high at 0.92 (95 % CI). Conclusions: There is lack of sufficient high quality scientific evidence in support or against the use of MRI in diagnosing nerve root compression and radiculopathy. Therefore, clinicians should always correlate the findings of MRI with the patients' medical history and clinical presentation in clinical decision making.Item Barriers and facilitators regarding patient adherence towards physiotherapy rehabilitation programs in the management of osteoarthritis in Nairobi, Kenya.(University of Western Cape, 2020) Wanunda, Wendy Ashley; Mlenzana, Nondwe; Tawa, NassibReduced adherence levels have been demonstrated by some patients affected with Osteoarthritis. Therefore, this study aimed at exploring the barriers and facilitators regarding patient adherence towards physiotherapy rehabilitation programs in the management of osteoarthritis in Nairobi, Kenya. The objectives of the study were to determine the clinical profile of patients with osteoarthritis on physiotherapy rehabilitation programs, to explore the patient-reported barriers and facilitators towards physiotherapy rehabilitation programs and exploring physiotherapists’ perceptions of patient adherence towards physiotherapy rehabilitation programs. The study setting was at the Kenyatta National Hospital physiotherapy clinic in Nairobi, Kenya.Item The correlation of the self-reported Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs score, clinical neurological examination findings and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with Lumbo-sacral radiculopathy(University of the Western Cape, 2014) Tawa, Nassib; Rhoda, Anthea; Diener, InaLumbo-sacral radiculopathy (LSR) is clinically defined as low back and referred leg symptoms accompanied by an objective sensory and/or motor deficit due to nerve root compromise. LSR is a common condition encountered by physiotherapists in clinical practice and the assessment and diagnosis remains a challenge owing to the complex anatomy of the lumbo-sacral spine segment and the various differentials. Moreover, LSR imposes a significant impact on patients’ health, functional ability, socio-economic status and quality of life. There are several diagnostic tools and procedures which are commonly utilised in practice, including diagnostic neuropathic pain screening questionnaires, clinical neurological tests, electro-diagnostics and imaging. However, the diagnostic utility and correlation of these tests have not been fully explored and remains debatable among clinicians and researchers in the fields of musculo-skeletal health and neurology. The aim of this study was to determine a correlation of the S-LANSS score, clinical neurological examination (CNE) findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports in the diagnosis of LSR among patients who presented with low back and referred leg symptoms. The study was conducted in three phases. In phase one, two systematic literature reviews were conducted; firstly, to establish the evidence-based accuracy of CNE in diagnosing LSR, and secondly, to establish the evidence-based accuracy of MRI in diagnosing LSR. In both systematic literature reviews, the diagnostic tests accuracy (DTA) protocol was used in planning, design and execution of literature search, selection of relevant studies, quality assessment, data analysis and presentation of the results. In phase two, clinical validation of an adopted S-LANSS scale and lumbar MRI reporting protocol were established, and a standardised evidence based lumbar CNE protocol developed.The face and content validity of the original S-LANSS score was established among a sample of Kenyan physiotherapists and patients who presented with low back and referred leg symptoms, using both quantitative and qualitative research designs. This was followed by a test-re-test reliability study on the adapted version of the S- LNASS score. The face and content validity of the adopted lumbar MRI reporting protocol was established among a sample of Kenyan radiologists followed by an inter-rater reliability. An evidence-based lumbar CNE protocol was developed; standardised and inter-examiner reliability was also examined among a sample of Kenyan physiotherapists. Finally, in phase three, a cross-sectional blinded validity study was conducted in six different physiotherapy departments. Participants (patients, physiotherapists and radiologists) were recruited using strict in- and exclusion criteria and data was collected using a pain and demographic questionnaire, the S-LANSS scale, the CNE protocol, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the MRI lumbar spine reporting protocol. Data was captured, cleaned and analysed using SPSS version 21. Descriptive analysis was done using frequencies, means and percentages, while inferential analysis was conducted using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test r to establish the correlation between the diagnostic tests. Cross tabulations, receiver operating curves (ROC) and scatter plots were used to establish the sensitivity and/or specificity of S-LANSS scale and individual CNE tests as defined by MRI. In phase three, which formed the main study of the research project, a total of 102 participants were recruited in this study with a gender distribution of 57% females and 43% males. The majority (67%) had neuropathic pain according to the S-LANSS scale and their pain intensity ranged from moderate (4-6) to severe (7-9) as recorded on a Numeric Pain rating Scale (NPRS), and was more common among manual workers. Similarly, patients whose pain had a neuropathic component had moderate to severe disability. The S-LANSS scale and lower limb neuro-dynamic tests were the most sensitive tests 0.79 and 0.75 respectively, while deep tendon reflexes were the most specific tests (0.87). The S-LANSS and CNE correlated fairly but significantly with MRI (r=0.36, P=0.01).LSR is a common condition and its assessment and diagnosis remains a clinical challenge among physiotherapists. MRI is a high-cost diagnostic tool but is being used by many clinicians in making decisions regarding the management of patients. Rapid and low-cost neuropathic pain screening by the use of the S-LANSS scale, together with use of evidence-based CNE of neuro-conduction and neuro-dynamic tests may be used in confirming nerve-root related MRI findings. These may be used in making a decision on whether to manage a patient conservatively using pharmacological agents and manual physiotherapy and therapeutic exercise, or consider surgery in the initial management of patients with clinical suspicion of LSR. This is especially valuable in the resource-poor settings like Kenya and other sub-Saharan African countries where MRI is costly or unavailable.Item The prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases among people living in Mombasa, Kenya(2010) Tawa, Nassib; Frantz, José Merle; Waggie, FirdouzaChronic non-communicable diseases, including cardio-vascular diseases and stroke, cancer, type 2 diabetes and chronic pulmonary disorders, are rapidly emerging as leading causes of morbidity and premature mortalities globally. The majority of the populations worldwide have experienced major transformations in disease profiles and health status characterized by a shift from infectious diseases and nutritional deficiencies to a predominance of chronic diseases of lifestyle. This epidemiological transition is regarded as an outcome of the environmental and socioeconomic changes following urbanization.Common behavioral health risk factors, such as smoking, risky alcohol consumption,sedentarism, overweigh/obesity and hypertension, have consistently been attributed to the development of chronic non-communicable diseases among populations.This thesis seeks to describe the epidemiology of the major common risk factors for noncommunicable diseases among people living in Mombasa, Kenya. The study responds to the WHO’S recommendations on comprehensive and continuous risk factor surveillance as an essential component of the public health information system and a vital health promoting strategy in the control and prevention of non-communicable diseases.A cross-sectional study design using the WHO STEPwise protocol was employed.Convenient stratification of the Mombasa population was done according to gender, age and setting categories. Using the Yamane formula n = N/1+ N(e²), a sample of 500 participants aged 15 to 70 years was arrived at. The researcher then conveniently selected public high schools, tertiary institutions, workplaces and a marketplace as the study settings.The WHO STEPS instrument (Core and Expanded Version 1.4) was used for data collection. Step 1 involved gathering information on socio-demographic characteristics and health-related behaviors of the participants using close-ended structured questions. Step involved the taking of simple anthropometrical measurements pertaining to height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure and pulse rate.Data were captured, cleaned and analyzed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) and SPSS version 16.0. Chi-square and Spearman correlation tests were used to determine associations between socio-demographic variables and behavioral health risk factors.The results indicated that 61% of the study participants possessed at least one of the investigated risk factors. 17% of the participants had a multiple risk factor profile, with 54% more females having a higher mean risk factor score compared to 46% of their male counterparts.Physical inactivity, hypertension and overweight/obesity were the most common registered risk factors, accounting respectively for 42%, 24% and 11%. Physical inactivity and hypertension formed the commonest cluster of multiple risk factor patterns; they co-occurred in 68% of the participants with a multiple risk factor profile.Increasing age, female gender and a low level of educational attainment were factors seen to be significantly associated with the development of risk factors for non-communicable diseases among the participants. It was observed that the burden of risk factors was unequally distributed among Mombasa residents; intervention programs based on our findings should therefore be used to ensure effectiveness. Future studies using nationally representative samples are further suggested to provide a more comprehensive analysis of a national risk factor profile.Item Risk factors for chronic non communicable diseases in Mombasa, Kenya: epidemiological study using WHO stepwise approach(OASIS, 2011) Tawa, Nassib; Waggie, Firdouza; Frantz, Jose M.OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence and distribution patterns of the major common risk factors for non communicable diseases among the people living in Mombasa, Kenya. METHODS: Using the WHO STEPwise approach, risk factors for non communicable diseases were analyzed for 305 people aged between 13 to 67 years. The study sample was arrived at through convenient stratification of the population according to age and setting followed by random selection of the participants. RESULTS: The most common individual risk factors registered were physical inactivity, hypertension and overweight/obesity accounting for 42%, 24% and 11% of the sample respectively. Participants who possessed a single risk factor profile were 42% and those who had multiple risk factors were approximately 17%. Hypertension and physical inactivity were the most common multiple risk factor pattern possessed by 7.5% of the participants who had at least one of the investigated risk factors for CNCDs. Socio-demographic characteristics including male gender, increasing age, being a student and low socio-economic status were found to be positive predictors of CNCDs CONCLUSION: The burden of CNCDs risk factors is unequally distributed among Mombasa residents. The poorest quintile posses the worst risk factor profile compared to their privileged counterparts. The implementation of WHO STEPwise approach was feasible since it revealed a comprehensive picture of the at-risk groups thus forming a vital baseline framework for target specific and cost-effective CNCDs control and prevention interventions.