Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse UWCScholar
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mbombo, Thandolwethu Miranda"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The international criminal court judgment in the Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen case: a critique.
    (University of the Western Cape, 2024) Mbombo, Thandolwethu Miranda
    The use of Restorative justice or Traditional justice mechanisms in Uganda was introduced as a way of reconciliation, accountability, and reparations after the mass atrocities committed by the Lord’s Resistance Army in Northern Uganda. The Juba Peace Agreement was established to pledge the use of both International Criminal Law (ICL) and Traditional Justice Mechanisms (TJMs) in Northern Uganda as part of the foundations of accountability and reconciliation after the conflict. However, this agreement was futile as arrest warrants had already been filed against the top leaders of the LRA before the agreement was signed. Dominic Ongwen was the only one amongst the 5 top commanders of the LRA who was tried and convicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC). In February 2021 the ICC found Dominic Ongwen guilty of 61 counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his involvement in the atrocities committed by the Lord's Resistance Army. The objective of this thesis is to critique the court's ruling, starting with its perceived failure to holistically consider the appropriateness of Traditional Justice Mechanisms (TJMs), Dominic Ongwen’s dual status as both a victim and perpetrator and the influence of spirituality in the crimes he committed. Furthermore, it aims to address the question of whether the ICC was the best forum to try Ongwen.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback