Browsing by Author "Max, Lennit Hendry"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An assessment of the reasons for the police’s use of excessive force and the dwindling confidence in their ability to protect human rights in South Africa
    (University of the Western Cape, 2024) Max, Lennit Hendry; Hamman ,Abraham John
    Presently, the police are regarded as the most corrupt institution in South Africa, hence it is opportune to place the spotlight on the causes of their constant use of excessive force. Importantly, it must be questioned why the continued use of excessive force is rapidly eroding the public’s trust in the police to protect their human rights. Much has been said about why we are losing faith in the police, but the link between police brutality and the public’s dwindling trust in the police as protectors of their rights has not been explored profoundly. This thesis sought to make a modest contribution in this regard. It considers the laws that permit the use of force and the reasons why the police routinely violate such laws. The thesis also interrogates why the use of excessive force colours the public’s negative perception and lack of faith in the police as guardians of fundamental human rights. International, regional and domestic law and experiences are considered through an extensive review of extant literature and studies on police brutality and the effects on civilians’ faith in the police to keep them safe and to protect their rights. Indications are overwhelmingly that issues such as poor leadership, political interference, lack of adequate oversight, poorly trained officers who lack knowledge and often respect for constitutional and legal prescripts, and lack of technology, i.e. less-lethal weapons and de-escalation training coupled with prejudicial beliefs about certain communities, exacerbate policing in South Africa. The police force thus symbolises a breeding ground for the flourishing of violence with impunity. It leaves the public with little choice but to lose faith in the police.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An evaluation of the effectiveness of the application of section 42 of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998
    (University of the Western Cape, 2012) Max, Lennit Hendry; Koornhof, Pieter
    This paper evaluates s 42 of the South African Employment Equity Act (EEA) with specific focus on the application of the demographic profile of the national and regional economically active population by designated employers. The comparative analysis considers how the law of affirmative action in the United States of America and in Namibia, international conventions and the International Labour Organization (ILO) in relation to South Africa’s Constitution and the EEA promote affirmative action. While international law holds that affirmative action measures should be of a temporary nature with an individualistic focus on formal equity, the EEA granted affirmative action measures which are permanent, group based and substantive in nature.Given South Africa`s discriminatory past, it became an accepted principle that affirmative action needs to be implemented to redress the imbalances caused by apartheid. In broad terms, the EEA provides for the advantage of persons or certain categories of persons who were disadvantaged by unfair discrimination. As a result the EEA focuses on race, sex and people with disabilities to determine those who are to be the beneficiaries of affirmative action. International Law also embraces the notion of affirmative action and place a duty on all member states to act pro-actively to correct the effects of unfair discrimination. The mini-thesis also evaluates the powers of the Director-General of Labour with specific focus on the enforcement of measures and how it relates to the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA) in compliance with the provisions of the EEA. It is concluded that s 42 of the EEA (with the exception of s 42(a)(i)) provides sufficient measures to redress the inequalities of the past by providing equal opportunities for suitably qualified people of the designated groups. That the Constitution and the EEA does not provide for differentiation amongst “Black people” (African, Coloureds and Indians). That the application of both the national and regional demographics are compulsory in formulating an equity plan, that the one cannot be ignored in favour of the other, and that the Director-General of Labour is sufficiently empowered to ensure compliance with the provisions of the EEA.