Scrutinising the modes of responsibility under the Rome statute : settling the dust

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorWerle, Gerhard
dc.contributor.authorBelay, Markos Debebe
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T16:48:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-02T09:03:01Z
dc.date.available2016-08-01T16:48:17Z
dc.date.available2024-04-02T09:03:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractUnder international criminal law (ICL), there are factual and legal intricacies. Of these intricacies, the issues concerning the modes of responsibility, which are enshrined under Article 25(3) of the ICC Statute, have been the preponderant focus. Specifically, besides the incongruity on the approaches of distinguishing among each other, there is no unanimity on the question of degrees of blameworthiness. Put differently, under ICL, there is uncertainty on how to draw a line among the modes of responsibility and the raison d'etre behind their enumeration. These ambivalences have caused various arguments both in and outside the ICC.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10566/10399
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Courten_US
dc.subjectInternational criminal lawen_US
dc.subjectCrimesen_US
dc.subjectModes of responsibilityen_US
dc.titleScrutinising the modes of responsibility under the Rome statute : settling the dusten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Belay_md_llm_law_2015.pdf
Size:
5.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Magister Legum - LLM (Criminal Justice and Procedure)