Nortje, Windell2022-05-032022-05-032021Nortje, Windell ‘Warrantless search and seizures by the South African police service: Weighing up the right to privacy versus the prevention of crime’ Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 24 (2021) pp. 1–271727-3781http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2021/v24i0a8153http://hdl.handle.net/10566/7337The constitutional right to privacy is enshrined in section 14 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. It is premised on the notion that all persons should be protected from intrusions on their privacy by any person or institution. The Constitutional Court has also, on numerous occasions, held that the right to privacy is bolstered by its connection with the right to human dignity. It is undeniable that every person's right to privacy should be protected. However, a person's right to privacy is violated when police officials conduct warrantless search and seizure operations. Generally section 22 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides for warrantless search and seizure operations when a police official has a reasonable suspicion that a search warrant will be issued to him and that a delay in obtaining such a warrant would defeat the object of the search.enConstitutionalityHuman dignityPoliceWarrantless seizuresSection 22 of the Criminal Procedure AcWarrantless search and seizures by the South African police service: Weighing up the right to privacy versus the prevention of crimeArticle