Garg, RaviMickenautsch, Steffen2022-10-032022-10-032022Garg, R., & Mickenautsch, S. (2022). Risk of selection bias assessment in the NINDS rt‑PA stroke study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01651-41471-2288https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01651-4http://hdl.handle.net/10566/7995The NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study is frequently cited in support of alteplase for acute ischemic stroke within 3 h of symptom onset. Multiple post-hoc reanalyses of this trial have been published to adjust for a baseline imbalance in stroke severity. We performed a risk of selection bias assessment and reanalyzed trial data to determine if the etiology of this baseline imbalance was more likely due to random chance or randomization errors. A risk of selection bias assessment was conducted using signaling questions from the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. Four sensitivity analyses were conducted on the trial data based on the randomization process: assessment of imbalances in allocation in unique strata; adherence to a pre-specified restriction on randomization between time strata at each randomization center; assessment of differences in baseline computed tomography (CT) results in unique strata; and comparison of baseline characteristics between allocation groups within each time strata. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to compare reported treatment effects with revised treatment effects after adjustment of baseline imbalances identified in the sensitivity analyses.enAcute ischemic strokeAlteplaseStrokeArticle