Mupangavanhu, Brighton M.2021-09-272021-09-272021Mupangavanhu, B. M.et al. (2021). Evolving statutory derivative action principles in South Africa: The good faith criterion and other legal grounds. Journal of African Law, 65(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00218553210001151464-3731https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855321000115http://hdl.handle.net/10566/6828The recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) judgment in Lazarus Mbethe v United Manganese of Kalahari raises jurisprudential questions regarding statutory derivative actions in South Africa. For example, the SCA did not agree with the court a quo’s ruling that the discretion to be exercised by the court is limited by provisions of section 165(5). The SCA also questioned whether it is necessary for South African courts to follow the good faith criterion in the Australian case of Swansson v Pratt as adopted into South African law through Mouritzen v Greystones Enterprises (Pty) Ltd & Another. This article contributes to these questions, and proposes possible criteria for other requirements in section 165(5)(b) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. These other requirements are that the statutory derivative action proceedings must involve “a trial of a serious question of material consequence to a company” and that proceedings be “in the best interests of the company”.enInternal management principleCompanies Act 71 of 2008Labour lawSouth AfricaStatutory derivative action proceedingsArticle